Difference between revisions of "Akachenti Constructions"
From Series Bible
(→Light/Auxiliary Verbs) |
(→Light/Auxiliary Verbs) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| da || dak(V) || independent || dak || to want | | da || dak(V) || independent || dak || to want | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | da || da- || prefix || da || <small>1. FUT. IMPERS. ''will''</small>; <small>2. SUBJUNCT. ''should''</small> | + | | da || da- || prefix || da || <small>1. FUT. IMPERS. ''will''</small>;<br><small>2. SUBJUNCT. ''should''</small> |
|- | |- | ||
| da || -da(k)(V) || suffix || da || to want | | da || -da(k)(V) || suffix || da || to want |
Revision as of 13:06, 8 August 2017
Contents
Summary
Akachenti calls their own affixation system "constructions", with fully inflected verbs generally called "constructed" verbs.
- Prefixes: morning constructions
- Suffixes: evening constructions
- Circumfixes/Discontinuous Affixes: morning and evening constructions or day constructions
This is separate from actual inflection, which is the modification of vowel person markers and sometimes verb stem.
This is also separate from derivation where a newly constructed word is treated as a single, totally new root. The line between derivation and construction is more blurred than the line between inflection and construction, as derived words are often not able to take further constructions or affixes.
Noun Constructions
Negation
Quantifiers
Relational/Possessive
Verb Constructions
Negation
Quantifiers
Tense-Aspect-Mood (TAM)
Light/Auxiliary Verbs
root | word | form | IPA | meaning |
---|---|---|---|---|
da | dak(V) | independent | dak | to want |
da | da- | prefix | da | 1. FUT. IMPERS. will; 2. SUBJUNCT. should |
da | -da(k)(V) | suffix | da | to want |